Supreme court rulings on gay marriage
Home / identity relationships / Supreme court rulings on gay marriage
They met online in 2020 (one lived in Pennsylvania, the other in Arizona), met in person in 2022 and by December they were a couple. Booz Allen Hamilton and Deloitte withdrew from WorldPride, Washington, D.C.
It all begs the question: Could Obergefell v. As a general practice, the court does not grant review without considering a case at at least two consecutive conferences.
After the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell, Kentucky’s governor at the time, Steve Beshear, sent a letter to the clerks in all of the state’s counties, directing them to “license and recognize the marriages of same-sex couples.”
Although a county attorney told Davis that she would be required to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, Davis opted instead to stop issuing marriage licenses to anyone – gay or straight.
Justices weigh revisiting landmark issue
Her appeal led to speculation about whether the court – which has become more conservative since it narrowly struck down same-sex marriage bans – would take another look at it.
"Today, five lawyers have ordered every state to change their definition of marriage," Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in his 2015 dissent.
What you would want if something happens to you, if you die, if you share children, particularly if they're adopted children? Ermold
Recommended Citation: Amy Howe, Will the Supreme Court revisit its ruling on same-sex marriage?, SCOTUSblog (Aug. "We realized we need to get married before the new administration comes in, because we don't know what kind of shenanigans are going to come in with marriage equality,” Tribbey told the NorthJersey.com, which is a part of the USA TODAY Network
Such concerns are on the minds of many as Pride Month 2025 gets underway.
Which is scary, but real."
If a worst-case scenario is barreling down on the LGBTQ+ community, it will encounter speed bumps.
In New Jersey, for example, there is strong pro-equality language in the marriage statutes. It reasoned that Davis is protected by the First Amendment when she is a private citizen, but she was acting on behalf of the government when she denied Moore and Ermold’s marriage license – an action that was not protected by the First Amendment.
They had talked of getting married in 2027, or 2028.
Alito dissented in Obergefell, contending that the Constitution leaves the same-sex marriage “question to be decided by the people of each state.” During a recent appearance in Washington, D.C., Alito again criticized the decision but indicated that he was “not suggesting that the decision … should be overruled.”
Two of the other dissenters in Obergefell – Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas – are still on the court.
“The case does not actually present, in a square and clean way, the question the coverage has suggested it does.”
Mat Staver, head of Liberty Counsel, the conservative legal group representing Davis, said his group won't give up and predicted ultimate success.
“It is not a matter of IF but WHEN Obergefell will be overturned,” he said in a statement.
As a statistical matter, Davis may face tough odds on convincing the Supreme Court to grant review, but the real question is whether there are four votes to revisit Obergefell (and five to overrule it).
In 2015, Davis was the clerk of Rowan County, Kentucky. Until it happened.
"There are things percolating," Kavin said.
But her lawyers plan to go further. I didn't just want a shoebox to be married in."
Perhaps, he said, they can have a more elaborate re-commitment ceremony in 2030 or so, when all of this has blown over. "Based on things we've heard the Supreme Court say in the past, I think they're going after anything that's not traditional.
Will the Supreme Court revisit its ruling on same-sex marriage?
Updated on Oct.
22 at 6:28 p.m.
In 2015, shortly after the Supreme Court recognized a constitutional right to same-sex marriage in Obergefell v. Have that in order. Hodges. Hodges, a local county clerk from Kentucky made national headlines when she refused on religious grounds to issue a marriage license to a gay couple, David Moore and David Ermold.
I've never been happier to lose.
Still, Carl Esbeck, an expert on religious liberty at the University of Missouri School of Law, said there’s "not a chance" the court is going to overturn Obergefell.
That’s in part because Congress passed a law in 2022 guaranteeing federal recognition of same-sex marriage rights, he said.
"It would be a useless act to overturn Obergefell," Esbeck said.
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, wrote a concurring opinion suggesting that Obergefell, among several other precedents, should be “reconsider[ed].” More recently, without addressing Obergefell directly, he told an audience at Catholic University’s Columbus School of Law that he didn’t “think that … any of these cases that have been decided are the gospel.”
Three new Republican appointees have joined the court since Obergefell.
"I think anything's on the table at this point."
Gay married couples, this year, are worried about things that might have seemed fanciful just a year ago. "The politics have simply moved on from same-sex marriage, even for conservative religious people."
Geoffrey R. Stone, who teaches law at the University of Chicago, agreed the court is unlikely to scrap Obergefell despite its willingness in recent years to overturn precedents on abortion and affirmative action.
While a majority of the current justices may disagree with Obergefell, the decision is generally approved by the public, he said.
More: From marginal religious groups to mainstream Christians, there's a shift in Supreme Court cases"For that reason, and to avoid the appearance of interpreting the Constitution in a manner that conforms to their own personal views," Stone said in an emailed response, "even some of the conservative justices might not vote to overrule Obergefell."
Supreme Court rejects challenge to landmark same-sex marriage decision
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Nov.
10 decided not to revisit its landmark ruling that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, leaving undisturbed a decade-old decision that some conservative justices oppose but that LGBTQ+ couples have relied on to legalize their relationships and create families.
The court rejected an appeal from Kim Davis, a former Kentucky county clerk who drew international attention when she refused to issue same-sex marriage licenses despite the 2015 decision, Obergefell v.